Yes, Glenn Armstrong is alleged to be committing Fraud, and it is perfectly legal to say that for the reasons stated below.
It is a complete defence to a claim in libel or slander if the publisher (this website) can show that the allegations they have published are substantially true.
It is a defence to a defamation claim if the publisher (this website) can show that what they published was a statement of opinion; that the statement complained of indicated the basis of that opinion; and that an honest person could have held the opinion based on any fact which existed at the time the statement was made.
On a matter of public interest: the publisher (this website) must show the statement complained of was, or formed part of, a statement on a matter of public interest and that the defendant reasonably believed that publishing the statement complained of was in the public interest, having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
This protects statements made on occasions where public policy requires people to able to speak freely. Qualified privilege provides a defence to the publisher of a statement in circumstances where they had a legal, social or moral duty or interest to make the publication and where the publishee has a corresponding interest in receiving it. If a defendant successfully establishes that a statement was made on an occasion of qualified privilege this offers a complete defence.
The information contained in this website is researched, detailed and accurate.
Mr Armstrong & Charlotte Armstrong have at all times been offered a right of reply to the matters stated in this website.
To this date they have not done so.
If you are a Police Officer, who has had this site reported, please contact the administrator on the contact page, as the Police have previously dealt with the complaint of this site by Glenn and Charlotte Armstrong and declined to proceed with the complaint both in the Civil and Criminal Courts.